Classified Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

2017 Carlton Fields Class Action Survey Highlights

April 18, 2017 by Carlton Fields

Carlton Fields recently released its sixth annual Class Action Survey, which is based on detailed interviews with general counsel and senior legal officers at 373 companies operating in more than 25 industries. Those individuals shared their thoughts and best practices on class action exposure and management. Highlights from this year’s survey include data on the types of class actions companies faced in 2016 and the likely next wave of class action.

Class-Actions By Type

Companies faced different volumes of class actions in different practice areas than in past years. Overall, companies’ class action spending across industries increased for the second consecutive year, reversing a downward trend that occurred between 2011 and 2014. In 2016, labor and employment cases accounted for the largest category of class actions, representing 37.7 percent of all class actions, which was a notable increase from 2015, when the percentage was just 24.1. The increase was due, in significant part, to a surge in wage and hour claims, particularly in California. Intellectual property class actions also increased significantly, jumping from 0.1 percent in 2015 to 7.5 percent in 2016. Securities actions increased from 7.3 percent to 9.6 percent. Consumer fraud cases decreased significantly, from 24.6 percent in 2015 to 19 percent. The percentage of products liability cases remained roughly consistent at 10.1 percent, and antitrust cases decreased slightly from 7.6 percent in 2015 to 6.5 percent.

Class-Actions By Type

Next Wave of Class Actions

This year, companies had different predictions as to the next wave of class actions than in past years. Companies in various industries agreed wage and hour class actions will continue to increase. Nearly 26 percent of companies predicted that these cases will form the next wave of class actions. Coming in second, Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) cases were considered the most likely wave of class actions by 22.2 percent of companies. Further, while data privacy class actions were highly anticipated for several years, they remained a small percentage of class action matters expected to occupy the next wave. Just 11.1 percent of companies predicted they will form the next wave of class actions. This likely reflects not only the proactive steps many organizations have taken to prevent, prepare for, and address possible data breaches, but also the fact that plaintiffs have had difficulty establishing damages in these cases. Other actions predicted to form the next wave of class actions included those resulting from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposed rules (13.7 percent), antitrust (11.1 percent), and non-discriminatory provisions of the Affordable Care Act (7.4 percent).

Class-Actions By Type

Read the full 2017 Class Action Survey here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

Class Representatives Do Not Hold Veto Power Over Class Settlement

Next Article »

Saved By The Bellwether Trial in the Ninth Circuit
Avatar

About Carlton Fields

Get Weekly Updates!

2020 Class Action Survey – Now Available!

DOWNLOAD NOW
Carlton Fields Logo A blog focused on the latest class action developments and trends by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Search

Topics

Industries/Practices
  • Construction
  • Consumer Finance & Banking
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care
  • Insurance
  • Labor, Employment & ERISA
  • Manufacturing & Products
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Privacy & Technology
  • Securities
  • Telecommunications

Substantive/Procedural
  • Arbitration
  • CAFA
  • Certification
    • Adequacy
    • Ascertainability
    • Commonality
    • Numerosity
    • Predominance
    • Superiority
    • Typicality
  • Decertification
  • Settlements
  • Standing
  • Striking of Class Allegations

Courts/Jurisdiction
  • Federal District Courts
  • Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal
  • United States Supreme Court
  • State Courts

Monthly Archives

Recent Articles

  • MDL Court Denies Class Certification of Proposed “NAS Babies” Class
  • What’s Good for Trial Is Good for Class Certification: Fifth Circuit Rules That Daubert Applies at Class Certification Stage
  • One Game, One Stadium: Eleventh Circuit Spikes Collateral Challenge to Tampa Bay Buccaneers Proposed Class Action Settlement

Get Weekly Updates!

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Class Action Survey

Related Industries/Practices

  • National Class Actions
  • National Trial Practice
  • Appellate & Trial Support
  • Our Class Action Experience

Classified: The Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact

Classified Logo
© 2014–2021 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.