Classified Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

New York District Court Flushes Nationwide Class, Permits New York Classes to Go Forward

by Carlton Fields

In three related actions before the Eastern District of New York, consumer plaintiffs who purchased moist toilet wipes manufactured and produced by Kimberly-Clark and sold by Costco alleged that defendants mislabeled the wipes as “flushable.” The court denied certification of a nationwide class, but did certify three New York class actions all involving New York law and New York purchases but different defendants and a different product.

The court declined to certify the nationwide class because the named plaintiff failed to demonstrate the “financial or other capacity to adequately represent a national class of consumers.” The court based this decision on plaintiff’s “reluctance to conduct a scientific survey of consumers to determine a reasonable consumer’s understanding of the term ‘flushable’” and that “conducting such a survey on a national scale would be costly.” The court further found limiting certification to New York classes appropriate because “the events underlying [plaintiff’s] claim took place in New York and discovery has largely been confined to New York.” As such, the court limited its certification to three New York classes, two in the present case and one in a related case.

Kurtz v. Kimberly–Clark Corp., No. 14–CV–1142 (E.D.N.Y Feb. 27, 2017).

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

A Not-So-Modest Proposal: Class Action Changes Could Have Big Impact

Next Article »

Two Second Circuit Cases, Two Applications of Campbell-Ewald, Two Different Results, Three Weeks Apart

About Carlton Fields

Related Articles

  1. Certification Denied for Purchasers of Product Awash with Design Differences
  2. Running on Empty: Defective Gas Class Sputters in Louisiana District Court
  3. Defects More Than Cosmetic: Beauty Product Purchasers Fail to Satisfy Rule 23

Get Weekly Updates!

Send Me Updates!

2025 Class Action Survey – Now Available!

DOWNLOAD NOW
Carlton Fields Logo A blog focused on the latest class action developments and trends by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Search

Topics

Industries/Practices
  • Construction
  • Consumer Finance & Banking
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care
  • Insurance
  • Labor, Employment & ERISA
  • Manufacturing & Products
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Privacy & Technology
  • Securities
  • Telecommunications

Substantive/Procedural
  • Arbitration
  • CAFA
  • Certification
    • Adequacy
    • Ascertainability
    • Commonality
    • Numerosity
    • Predominance
    • Superiority
    • Typicality
  • Decertification
  • Settlements
  • Standing
  • Striking of Class Allegations

Courts/Jurisdiction
  • Federal District Courts
  • Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal
  • United States Supreme Court
  • State Courts

Monthly Archives

Recent Articles

  • Supreme Court Refuses to Decide Whether Damages Class Containing Both Injured and Uninjured Members Can Be Certified
  • Royal Canin v. Wullschleger: A Primer on Jurisdiction
  • Classified (Bi-)Monthly: A Roundup of Class Action Decisions From Federal Appellate Courts July and August 2024

Get Weekly Updates!

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Class Action Survey

Related Industries/Practices

  • National Class Actions
  • National Trial Practice
  • Appellate & Trial Support
  • Our Class Action Experience

Classified®: The Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright © 2025 · Carlton Fields · All Rights Reserved