Classified Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

New Putative Class Action in South Florida Tackles COVID-19 Outbreak Head-On

by Brooke Patterson and Stephanie Fichera

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, class action litigation of various types has been initiated, ranging from consumer to employment class actions. Most of these class actions seemingly relate to companies’ reactions to the pandemic, but a recent class action filed in the Southern District of Florida addresses the COVID-19 pandemic head-on.

In early March, a complaint was filed by Logan Alters and other named plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, against the People’s Republic of China and various other Chinese governmental agencies overseeing the response to the coronavirus pandemic in China. Alters alleges that the People’s Republic of China, and other governmental entities, knew that COVID-19 was dangerous, failed to timely report the outbreak and covered up the outbreak to protect their economic self-interest, and that this conduct has caused injury and harm to the named plaintiffs and class members. As an alternative theory, Alters also alleges that COVID-19 escaped from a bioweapon research lab in Wuhan due to lax controls or because Chinese researchers sold lab animals into the marketplace in violation of Chinese law.

The complaint defines a national noncommercial tort class consisting of “[a]ll persons and legal entities in the United States who have suffered injury, damage, and loss related to the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus.” The complaint also defines a Florida noncommercial tort subclass, which includes “[a]ll persons and legal entities in the State of Florida who have suffered injury, damage, and loss related to the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus.” Additional named plaintiff TBT Training also asserts separate national and Florida commercial classes with similar class language.

Alters alleges that common questions of law and fact include whether the defendants’ conduct was negligent or reckless, was contrary to precepts of humanity, or violated Chinese law and whether Chinese bioweapons labs are ultrahazardous activities and caused the release of the virus.

The complaint brings claims of negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, intentional infliction of emotional distress, strict liability for conducting ultrahazardous activity, and public nuisance against all defendants for each class and subclass.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

Forewarned Is Forearmed: Why Companies Need to Review Their COBRA Notices to Avoid Growing Class Action Trend

Next Article »

Price Gouging During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Armas v. Amazon Inc.

About Brooke Patterson

Brooke Patterson is an associate at Carlton Fields in Miami, Florida. Connect with Brooke on LinkedIn.

About Stephanie Fichera

Stephanie A. Fichera is a shareholder at Carlton Fields in Miami, Florida. Connect with Stephanie on LinkedIn.

Related Articles

  1. No Nationwide Standing for Florida-Based Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation Litigation Class Representative
  2. Running on Empty: Defective Gas Class Sputters in Louisiana District Court
  3. Keep the Change – The Southern District of New York Authorizes Claims Administrator to Retain Portion of Accrued Interest on Settlement Funds

Get Weekly Updates!

Send Me Updates!

2025 Class Action Survey – Now Available!

DOWNLOAD NOW
Carlton Fields Logo A blog focused on the latest class action developments and trends by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Search

Topics

Industries/Practices
  • Construction
  • Consumer Finance & Banking
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care
  • Insurance
  • Labor, Employment & ERISA
  • Manufacturing & Products
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Privacy & Technology
  • Securities
  • Telecommunications

Substantive/Procedural
  • Arbitration
  • CAFA
  • Certification
    • Adequacy
    • Ascertainability
    • Commonality
    • Numerosity
    • Predominance
    • Superiority
    • Typicality
  • Decertification
  • Settlements
  • Standing
  • Striking of Class Allegations

Courts/Jurisdiction
  • Federal District Courts
  • Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal
  • United States Supreme Court
  • State Courts

Monthly Archives

Recent Articles

  • Supreme Court Refuses to Decide Whether Damages Class Containing Both Injured and Uninjured Members Can Be Certified
  • Royal Canin v. Wullschleger: A Primer on Jurisdiction
  • Classified (Bi-)Monthly: A Roundup of Class Action Decisions From Federal Appellate Courts July and August 2024

Get Weekly Updates!

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Class Action Survey

Related Industries/Practices

  • National Class Actions
  • National Trial Practice
  • Appellate & Trial Support
  • Our Class Action Experience

Classified®: The Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright © 2025 · Carlton Fields · All Rights Reserved