Classified Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

The Lack of Actual Injury Defense: The Landscape Since TransUnion

by Nathaniel G. Foell

The 2023 Carlton Fields Class Action Survey found that the second most successful class action defense is the lack of any actual injury suffered by some or all of the class. It also found that this defense made a big jump in effectiveness from the previous year’s survey.

Those findings may be related to the fact that just over two years ago, in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, the Supreme Court confirmed that “Article III does not give federal courts the power to order relief to any uninjured plaintiff, class action or not.” For that reason, in a Rule 23(b)(3) class action, it is not enough that a named plaintiff has standing. “Every class member must have Article III standing in order to recover individual damages.”

An issue that TransUnion noted but did not address is “whether every class member must demonstrate standing before a court certifies a class.” In noting the issue, the Supreme Court cited the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Cordoba v. DirecTV LLC. In Cordoba, the Eleventh Circuit confronted the question “whether a district court should sort out the uninjured class members before granting class certification” or instead “can wait until a later stage in the proceeding to determine which class members have suffered a redressable injury and are entitled to relief and which are not.” It held that while a court is not “required to ensure that the class definition does not include any individuals who do not have standing before certifying a class,” a court “must consider under Rule 23(b)(3) before certification whether the individualized issue of standing will predominate over the common issues in the case.”

In the two years since TransUnion was decided, more circuit court decisions have grappled with the question raised but not resolved by TransUnion: must every class member demonstrate standing before a court certifies a class? Or, put more generally, how does the requirement that every class member must have Article III standing in order to recover individual damages impact the Rule 23(b)(3) class certification analysis?

In the coming weeks, this blog will feature a series of articles surveying those post-TransUnion circuit court decisions. Together, this series of articles will provide an overview of how the increasingly popular lack of actual injury defense to class actions, and in particular to class certification, has been faring since TransUnion.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

Class Action Survey: What Strategies Are Most Effective at Reducing Cost and Managing Risk in Class Action Litigation?

Next Article »

Class Action Survey: Companies Report Big Drop in COVID-19 Class Actions

About Nathaniel G. Foell

Nathaniel Foell is a shareholder at Carlton Fields in Tampa, Florida. Connect with Nathaniel on LinkedIn.

Related Articles

  1. The Future of Standing in Data Breach Class Actions
  2. Ninth Circuit Holds ADA Certified Class Has Standing to Challenge Facilities Not Personally Visited by Plaintiff
  3. No Injury, No Problem?: The First Circuit Weighs in on Certification Where Absent Class Members Lack Harm

Get Weekly Updates!

Send Me Updates!

2025 Class Action Survey – Now Available!

DOWNLOAD NOW
Carlton Fields Logo A blog focused on the latest class action developments and trends by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Search

Topics

Industries/Practices
  • Construction
  • Consumer Finance & Banking
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care
  • Insurance
  • Labor, Employment & ERISA
  • Manufacturing & Products
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Privacy & Technology
  • Securities
  • Telecommunications

Substantive/Procedural
  • Arbitration
  • CAFA
  • Certification
    • Adequacy
    • Ascertainability
    • Commonality
    • Numerosity
    • Predominance
    • Superiority
    • Typicality
  • Decertification
  • Settlements
  • Standing
  • Striking of Class Allegations

Courts/Jurisdiction
  • Federal District Courts
  • Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal
  • United States Supreme Court
  • State Courts

Monthly Archives

Recent Articles

  • Supreme Court Refuses to Decide Whether Damages Class Containing Both Injured and Uninjured Members Can Be Certified
  • Royal Canin v. Wullschleger: A Primer on Jurisdiction
  • Classified (Bi-)Monthly: A Roundup of Class Action Decisions From Federal Appellate Courts July and August 2024

Get Weekly Updates!

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Class Action Survey

Related Industries/Practices

  • National Class Actions
  • National Trial Practice
  • Appellate & Trial Support
  • Our Class Action Experience

Classified®: The Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright © 2025 · Carlton Fields · All Rights Reserved