Classified Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Issue of Gmail Users’ Consent to Google’s Email-Interception Practices Defeats Class Certification

April 11, 2014 by Paul G. Williams

Google recently scored a big victory in its battle against claims that it is illegally intercepting and scanning the content of emails in order to provide personalized advertisements to Gmail users.  Plaintiffs in the various lawsuits – which were consolidated for pretrial purposes in the Northern District of California – sought certification of classes including “education” users, who use Gmail provided by their school, as well as other direct and indirect users (including individuals who do not have Gmail accounts, but send emails to Gmail users).

In its order denying plaintiffs’ motion for class certification with prejudice, the court agreed with Google that the issue of plaintiffs’ express or implied consent to Google’s interception practices defeated the predominance requirement of Rule 23(b)(3).  As to the “education” users, the court found that “express” consent could not be decided on a classwide basis because Google allows educational institutions to provide end users vastly different disclosures, some of which might be sufficiently clear for a finding of consent while others might not.  As to the other users, the court found that “implied” consent could not be decided on a classwide basis because it was a question of fact requiring examination of all the surrounding circumstances.  The court noted that email users could have learned of Google’s interception practices through a panoply of sources (including various news reports) beyond Google’s terms of service and privacy policies.  The Plaintiffs are currently seeking to appeal the court’s decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f).

Even if the Ninth Circuit declines to hear the appeal, the allegations against Google could proceed as individual lawsuits or potentially be re-filed with different class allegations.  Any company or organization engaged in targeted online advertising, data mining, or consumer-facing big data analytics should keep any eye on this case when considering how to gather and use consumer data and how consumers interact with so-called “freemium” online services.

In re: Google Inc. Gmail Litig., Case No. 13-MD-02430 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2014).

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

Securities Class Actions Receive Increased Scrutiny: District Court Applies “Stringent Standards” Of Dukes And Comcast To Deny Certification

Next Article »

Seventh Circuit Reverses Remand Order Based On Supreme Court’s Knowles Decision
Avatar

About Paul G. Williams

Related Articles

  1. Correlation Is Not Causation: Class Certification Denied Because Experts’ Methodologies Fail To Show Predominate Antitrust Injury For Either Direct Or Indirect Purchasers Of Optical Disk Drives
  2. GCs facing more bet-the-company and higher exposure class actions
  3. TCPA Class Certified Based Largely on “Concrete Injury” Determination

Get Weekly Updates!

2019 Class Action Survey – Now Available!

DOWNLOAD NOW
Carlton Fields Logo A blog focused on the latest class action developments and trends by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Search

Topics

Industries/Practices
  • Construction
  • Consumer Finance & Banking
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care
  • Insurance
  • Labor, Employment & ERISA
  • Manufacturing & Products
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Privacy & Technology
  • Securities
  • Telecommunications

Substantive/Procedural
  • Arbitration
  • CAFA
  • Certification
    • Adequacy
    • Ascertainability
    • Commonality
    • Numerosity
    • Predominance
    • Superiority
    • Typicality
  • Decertification
  • Settlements
  • Standing
  • Striking of Class Allegations

Courts/Jurisdiction
  • Federal District Courts
  • Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal
  • United States Supreme Court
  • State Courts

Monthly Archives

Recent Articles

  • Class Action Survey: What Percentage of Class Action Lawsuits Are Settled? When do Most Settlements Occur?
  • Class Action Survey: True or False? The Amount of Time In-House Attorneys Spent Managing Class Actions Has Increased.
  • No Speaking? No Standing!

Get Weekly Updates!

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Class Action Survey

Related Industries/Practices

  • National Class Actions
  • National Trial Practice
  • Appellate & Trial Support
  • Our Class Action Experience

Classified: The Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact

Classified Logo
© 2014–2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.