Classified Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

New Putative Class Action in South Florida Tackles COVID-19 Outbreak Head-On

April 8, 2020 by Brooke Patterson and Stephanie Fichera

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, class action litigation of various types has been initiated, ranging from consumer to employment class actions. Most of these class actions seemingly relate to companies’ reactions to the pandemic, but a recent class action filed in the Southern District of Florida addresses the COVID-19 pandemic head-on.

In early March, a complaint was filed by Logan Alters and other named plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, against the People’s Republic of China and various other Chinese governmental agencies overseeing the response to the coronavirus pandemic in China. Alters alleges that the People’s Republic of China, and other governmental entities, knew that COVID-19 was dangerous, failed to timely report the outbreak and covered up the outbreak to protect their economic self-interest, and that this conduct has caused injury and harm to the named plaintiffs and class members. As an alternative theory, Alters also alleges that COVID-19 escaped from a bioweapon research lab in Wuhan due to lax controls or because Chinese researchers sold lab animals into the marketplace in violation of Chinese law.

The complaint defines a national noncommercial tort class consisting of “[a]ll persons and legal entities in the United States who have suffered injury, damage, and loss related to the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus.” The complaint also defines a Florida noncommercial tort subclass, which includes “[a]ll persons and legal entities in the State of Florida who have suffered injury, damage, and loss related to the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus.” Additional named plaintiff TBT Training also asserts separate national and Florida commercial classes with similar class language.

Alters alleges that common questions of law and fact include whether the defendants’ conduct was negligent or reckless, was contrary to precepts of humanity, or violated Chinese law and whether Chinese bioweapons labs are ultrahazardous activities and caused the release of the virus.

The complaint brings claims of negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, intentional infliction of emotional distress, strict liability for conducting ultrahazardous activity, and public nuisance against all defendants for each class and subclass.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

Forewarned Is Forearmed: Why Companies Need to Review Their COBRA Notices to Avoid Growing Class Action Trend

Next Article »

Price Gouging During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Armas v. Amazon Inc.
Brooke Patterson

About Brooke Patterson

Brooke Patterson is an associate at Carlton Fields in Miami, Florida. Connect with Brooke on LinkedIn.

Stephanie Fichera

About Stephanie Fichera

Stephanie A. Fichera is a shareholder at Carlton Fields in Miami, Florida. Connect with Stephanie on LinkedIn.

Get Weekly Updates!

2020 Class Action Survey – Now Available!

DOWNLOAD NOW
Carlton Fields Logo A blog focused on the latest class action developments and trends by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Search

Topics

Industries/Practices
  • Construction
  • Consumer Finance & Banking
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care
  • Insurance
  • Labor, Employment & ERISA
  • Manufacturing & Products
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Privacy & Technology
  • Securities
  • Telecommunications

Substantive/Procedural
  • Arbitration
  • CAFA
  • Certification
    • Adequacy
    • Ascertainability
    • Commonality
    • Numerosity
    • Predominance
    • Superiority
    • Typicality
  • Decertification
  • Settlements
  • Standing
  • Striking of Class Allegations

Courts/Jurisdiction
  • Federal District Courts
  • Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal
  • United States Supreme Court
  • State Courts

Monthly Archives

Recent Articles

  • MDL Court Denies Class Certification of Proposed “NAS Babies” Class
  • What’s Good for Trial Is Good for Class Certification: Fifth Circuit Rules That Daubert Applies at Class Certification Stage
  • One Game, One Stadium: Eleventh Circuit Spikes Collateral Challenge to Tampa Bay Buccaneers Proposed Class Action Settlement

Get Weekly Updates!

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Class Action Survey

Related Industries/Practices

  • National Class Actions
  • National Trial Practice
  • Appellate & Trial Support
  • Our Class Action Experience

Classified: The Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact

Classified Logo
© 2014–2021 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.