Classified Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Nigerian Natural Gas Drilling Rig Explosion Class Action Blown Away

April 13, 2017 by Carlton Fields

The Northern District of California recently denied a motion for class certification in a case against Chevron Corporation connected to a 2012 explosion at a Nigerian natural gas drilling rig and the environmental impacts of that explosion. The case had an extensive procedural history which saw numerous amended complaints, a series of revisions revising the putative class down from over 65,000 Nigerians to a fraction of that number, and multiple extensions of discovery deadlines and filing deadlines on the motion to certify. The most recent opinion resolved a series of evidentiary disputes and, most importantly, the motion to certify a class action.

The court began by noting persisting problems in the proposed class definition before moving onto the substantive class action requirements under Federal Rule 23. Although there was a typicality concern because the named plaintiff Gbarabe was potentially subject to a unique standing defense, the court declined to ultimately decide the issue because the class certification motion failed on adequacy and superiority grounds.

The court concluded that Gbarabe was an inadequate representative because of serious credibility concerns arising from plaintiff’s false statements and inconsistent testimony. Further, the court found class counsel inadequate because of its complete disregard for scheduling orders and demonstrated unfamiliarity with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Additionally, the putative class action failed on superiority grounds under Federal Rule 23(b). Each of the superiority considerations analyzed weighed in favor of Chevron: the significant individual interest in controlling the litigation, the existence of over 70 pre-existing lawsuits in Nigerian courts related to the explosion, the tenuous connections of the underlying facts to the Northern District of California, and the likely difficulty in managing thousands of Nigerian plaintiffs.

For these reasons, the plaintiff failed to meet its burden to justify class certification and the court denied the motion.

Gbarabe v. Chevron Corp. Case No 14-173 (USDC N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2017).

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

Eleventh Circuit Finds Dual Citizenship Defeats CAFA Diversity

Next Article »

Pay Attention: A Class Certification Decision You Might Want To Remember
Avatar

About Carlton Fields

Get Weekly Updates!

2020 Class Action Survey – Now Available!

DOWNLOAD NOW
Carlton Fields Logo A blog focused on the latest class action developments and trends by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Search

Topics

Industries/Practices
  • Construction
  • Consumer Finance & Banking
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care
  • Insurance
  • Labor, Employment & ERISA
  • Manufacturing & Products
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Privacy & Technology
  • Securities
  • Telecommunications

Substantive/Procedural
  • Arbitration
  • CAFA
  • Certification
    • Adequacy
    • Ascertainability
    • Commonality
    • Numerosity
    • Predominance
    • Superiority
    • Typicality
  • Decertification
  • Settlements
  • Standing
  • Striking of Class Allegations

Courts/Jurisdiction
  • Federal District Courts
  • Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal
  • United States Supreme Court
  • State Courts

Monthly Archives

Recent Articles

  • MDL Court Denies Class Certification of Proposed “NAS Babies” Class
  • What’s Good for Trial Is Good for Class Certification: Fifth Circuit Rules That Daubert Applies at Class Certification Stage
  • One Game, One Stadium: Eleventh Circuit Spikes Collateral Challenge to Tampa Bay Buccaneers Proposed Class Action Settlement

Get Weekly Updates!

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Class Action Survey

Related Industries/Practices

  • National Class Actions
  • National Trial Practice
  • Appellate & Trial Support
  • Our Class Action Experience

Classified: The Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact

Classified Logo
© 2014–2021 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.