Classified Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

No Repose for Debate on Applicability of American Pipe Tolling

by Amy Lane Hurwitz and Gary M. Pappas

In its seminal 1974 American Pipe opinion, the Supreme Court held that the commencement of a class action tolls the applicable statutes of limitation as to all putative class members who would have been parties had the class been certified. Since then, courts have repeatedly applied American Pipe to toll statutes of limitation but disagreed as to whether the doctrine is based on legal principals under Rule 23 or the equitable power of the courts. The Eleventh Circuit recently confronted the issue of whether American Pipe tolling also applies to statutes of repose.

In March 2014, plaintiffs filed a putative class action in the Middle District of Florida against JPMorgan for securities fraud arising out of the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal. Madoff was arrested in December 2008. The statute of repose under the Securities Exchange Act is five years. Plaintiffs contended that the pendency of a consolidated group of class actions in the Southern District of New York brought by Madoff investors against JPMorgan (Shapiro v. JPMorgan) tolled the repose period under American Pipe until the case settled in January 2014. Plaintiffs relied on a Tenth Circuit case in which the court extended American Pipe tolling to a statute of repose, finding that the statute was “a rule of legal tolling derived from Rule 23.” Joseph v. Wiles, 223 F. 3d 1155 (10th Cir. 2000). The district court disagreed and dismissed plaintiffs’ federal claims with prejudice as time barred.

On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit acknowledged the ongoing controversy over whether American Pipe was “legal” or “equitable” tolling but noted its own precedent – as well as that of subsequent Supreme Court cases – had clearly described it as equitable. The court then analyzed the different purposes and objectives of statutes of limitation compared to statutes of repose and concluded that statutes of repose are not subject to equitable tolling under the Rules Enabling Act. Disagreeing with the Tenth Circuit’s ruling in Joseph and joining the Second and Sixth Circuits, the court found that American Pipe tolling applies only to statutes of limitation and affirmed the district court’s dismissal.

Dusek v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., Case No. 15-14463 (11th Cir., Aug. 10, 2016)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

Seventh Circuit Strikes Again – Rejects Settlement In Shareholder Deal Litigation

Next Article »

Eighth Circuit Privacy Class Action Fails to Clear Second Hurdle

About Amy Lane Hurwitz

Amy Hurwitz is a shareholder at Carlton Fields in Miami, Florida. Connect with Amy on LinkedIn.

About Gary M. Pappas

Gary Pappas is a shareholder at Carlton Fields in Miami, Florida. Connect with Gary on LinkedIn.

Related Articles

  1. Eleventh Circuit Affirms Securities Fraud Class Certification, Remands for Evidence to Rebut Presumption of Market Efficiency
  2. Second Circuit Doubles Down on Rule Preventing Non-Settling Parties from Objecting to Class Settlement
  3. Supreme Court to Resolve Whether Failure to Disclose Under Item 303 of SEC Regulation S-K Gives Rise to Securities Fraud Claims

Get Weekly Updates!

Send Me Updates!

2025 Class Action Survey – Now Available!

DOWNLOAD NOW
Carlton Fields Logo A blog focused on the latest class action developments and trends by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Search

Topics

Industries/Practices
  • Construction
  • Consumer Finance & Banking
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care
  • Insurance
  • Labor, Employment & ERISA
  • Manufacturing & Products
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Privacy & Technology
  • Securities
  • Telecommunications

Substantive/Procedural
  • Arbitration
  • CAFA
  • Certification
    • Adequacy
    • Ascertainability
    • Commonality
    • Numerosity
    • Predominance
    • Superiority
    • Typicality
  • Decertification
  • Settlements
  • Standing
  • Striking of Class Allegations

Courts/Jurisdiction
  • Federal District Courts
  • Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal
  • United States Supreme Court
  • State Courts

Monthly Archives

Recent Articles

  • Supreme Court Refuses to Decide Whether Damages Class Containing Both Injured and Uninjured Members Can Be Certified
  • Royal Canin v. Wullschleger: A Primer on Jurisdiction
  • Classified (Bi-)Monthly: A Roundup of Class Action Decisions From Federal Appellate Courts July and August 2024

Get Weekly Updates!

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Class Action Survey

Related Industries/Practices

  • National Class Actions
  • National Trial Practice
  • Appellate & Trial Support
  • Our Class Action Experience

Classified®: The Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact

Copyright © 2025 · Carlton Fields · All Rights Reserved