Classified Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Take Notice: FTC Reports on Claims Rates and Settlement Notices

March 11, 2020 by D. Matthew Allen

In September 2019, the Federal Trade Commission issued a staff report titled “Consumers and Class Actions: A Retrospective and Analysis of Settlement Campaigns.” The FTC staff studied 149 consumer class action settlements and conducted an internet-based consumer research study to explore consumer understanding of class action notices. Among the salient findings were:

  • The overall claims rate of the cases in the sample was less than 10%. Specifically, the median calculated claims rate was 9%, and the weighted mean was 4%.
  • The claims rate varied depending on whether class members received notice by packets, postcards, or email.
    • If class notice was given in the form of a direct mail packet, including claim forms, the claims rate was approximately 10%.
    • Postcard notice resulted in a 6% claims rate, and email notice resulted in a 3% claims rate.
    • However, postcard notices that included a detachable claim form had claims rates more in line with the 10% rate for packet notices.
    • Less than half of the study respondents understood that an email pertained to a class action settlement rather than being for promotional purposes.
  • Publication notice as a supplement to direct notice did not appreciably impact claims rates.
  • Claims rates were higher when the notice used “plain English” language to describe available settlement payments.
  • Objection and exclusion rates were miniscule. Only 0.01% of notice recipients opted out; 0.0003% objected to the proposed settlement.

These conclusions are not particularly surprising. Nonetheless, they provide objective confirmation of what most class action practitioners have intuitively known to be true. Thus, the FTC staff report provides helpful information for parties to use when deciding the form of settlement notice. It also can be cited to a court when seeking approval of settlements where claims rates exceed the averages.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

Class Action Survey: What Percentage of Companies are Facing Class Actions in Which Exposure is Deemed Potentially Devastating?

Next Article »

The Conservative Case for Class Actions: A Provocative Proposal
D. Matthew Allen

About D. Matthew Allen

Matt Allen is a shareholder at Carlton Fields in Tampa, Florida.

Get Weekly Updates!

2020 Class Action Survey – Now Available!

DOWNLOAD NOW
Carlton Fields Logo A blog focused on the latest class action developments and trends by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Search

Topics

Industries/Practices
  • Construction
  • Consumer Finance & Banking
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care
  • Insurance
  • Labor, Employment & ERISA
  • Manufacturing & Products
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Privacy & Technology
  • Securities
  • Telecommunications

Substantive/Procedural
  • Arbitration
  • CAFA
  • Certification
    • Adequacy
    • Ascertainability
    • Commonality
    • Numerosity
    • Predominance
    • Superiority
    • Typicality
  • Decertification
  • Settlements
  • Standing
  • Striking of Class Allegations

Courts/Jurisdiction
  • Federal District Courts
  • Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal
  • United States Supreme Court
  • State Courts

Monthly Archives

Recent Articles

  • MDL Court Denies Class Certification of Proposed “NAS Babies” Class
  • What’s Good for Trial Is Good for Class Certification: Fifth Circuit Rules That Daubert Applies at Class Certification Stage
  • One Game, One Stadium: Eleventh Circuit Spikes Collateral Challenge to Tampa Bay Buccaneers Proposed Class Action Settlement

Get Weekly Updates!

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • Class Action Survey

Related Industries/Practices

  • National Class Actions
  • National Trial Practice
  • Appellate & Trial Support
  • Our Class Action Experience

Classified: The Class Action Blog

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact

Classified Logo
© 2014–2021 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.